Comments on: exomel v2

by: Brook

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:35:55 -0800

I really like the new design!

Great job!

by: Brad

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:05:57 -0800

Site looks WAY better than the older one but I’m glad to see you still kept it around. The new colors look great.

by: Joe

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:49:26 -0800

Very nice! I love the colors.

by: Joël

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:04:11 -0800

Hum. I was expecting something less classical… It’s nice and neat, but lacks a bit of personality, imho…

by: Remi

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:18:36 -0800

Man, I knew you were going to say something like that. It doesn’t look too “classical” for me at all. I made an effort to use a different font than the “classical” Verdana.

by: maarch

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:15:15 -0800

Love it, it looks like the other one, but the colours are better!

Good job !

by: Rémi R.

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:32:22 -0800

Wow! Remi, I love the new design. You’ve found the perfect balance with the colors! I wish my blog can look as nice as yours…

by: ext

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:54:43 -0800

Quoting Rémi :
” I made an effort to use a different font than the “classical” Verdana.”

The fact about Century Gothic is that it’s not easy to read (a looks like o, I > is it a small “l” like in “look” or a big I like in “Ike Turner”?)…
Classical doesn’t mean I don’t like it, but I’m still searching the Rémi touch somewhere in this design…

by: Remi

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:11:35 -0800

It’s also bad that Century Gothic is not installed by default on Mac OS X…

by: mireille

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:47:22 -0800

Actually, you might not care about this, but I still see the Watermelon style with Verdana.

And as I like melons (…), I’m staying with the other one :P