<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS newbie</title>
	<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie</link>
	<description>The hypermedia home of web design and multimedia student, Remi Prevost.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Rob Mientjes</title>
		<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1437</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:09:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1437</guid>
					<description>Well, it's a hard thing to get, but the most &lt;em&gt;important&lt;/em&gt; thing is to get how the cascade works, &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt; it doesn't work in that other browser and how the CSS itself works, why it all does what it does. That's what I tell every new recruit ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, it&#8217;s a hard thing to get, but the most <em>important</em> thing is to get how the cascade works, <em>why</em> it doesn&#8217;t work in that other browser and how the <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> itself works, why it all does what it does. That&#8217;s what I tell every new recruit ;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Antoine</title>
		<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1438</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:21:18 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1438</guid>
					<description>True and Remi is a kind of CS* newbie. :D

* Counter-Strike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>True and Remi is a kind of CS* newbie. :D</p>
	<p>* Counter-Strike
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Remi</title>
		<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1439</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:22:44 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1439</guid>
					<description>It's because I never played to CS :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s because I never played to CS :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brook</title>
		<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1440</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:12:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1440</guid>
					<description>I found in building my site that trial-and-error is man's best friend.

Through trial and error you come to understand &lt;acronym title=&quot;Cascading Style Sheets&quot;&gt;CSS&lt;/acronym&gt;...

...and you learn patience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I found in building my site that trial-and-error is man&#8217;s best friend.</p>
	<p>Through trial and error you come to understand <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets"><acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym></acronym>&#8230;</p>
	<p>&#8230;and you learn patience!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeam</title>
		<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1441</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 13:15:32 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1441</guid>
					<description>1- IE sucks but 90% of people on the web use it. So we must do something 100% compatible with ie or insert a BEAUTIFUL Mozilla Firefox Powered at the bottom of each website to remember them IE is not very secure for them!

So come on fiz... A beautiful Fox on your website should be great ;)

2- And, i think you redesign your website very too often...
But if is better than the present one... I hope see it soon!

3- Im proud to say than my website is in css only. Thanks for your influence fiz!

4- I don't like P.S.'s but #-. Step by step mf!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>1- IE sucks but 90% of people on the web use it. So we must do something 100% compatible with ie or insert a BEAUTIFUL Mozilla Firefox Powered at the bottom of each website to remember them IE is not very secure for them!</p>
	<p>So come on fiz&#8230; A beautiful Fox on your website should be great ;)</p>
	<p>2- And, i think you redesign your website very too often&#8230;<br />
But if is better than the present one&#8230; I hope see it soon!</p>
	<p>3- <acronym title="Instant Messaging">IM</acronym> proud to say than my website is in <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> only. Thanks for your influence fiz!</p>
	<p>4- I don&#8217;t like P.S.&#8217;s but #-. Step by step mf!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1448</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:44:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1448</guid>
					<description>I hope the strike comes to end soon.   Just thought I'd drop a line to say that I enjoyed the design and layout of the site and keep up the excellent work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I hope the strike comes to end soon.   Just thought I&#8217;d drop a line to say that I enjoyed the design and layout of the site and keep up the excellent work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ash Haque</title>
		<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1449</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 19:21:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1449</guid>
					<description>It was weird, I usually need like a whole bunch of css hacks (all of them for IE) to get my site to display properly on IE and Firefox. After my last redesign where I aimed for xhtml 1.0 strict and everything I only needed one. PS. I found using borders on most divs help a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It was weird, I usually need like a whole bunch of <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> hacks (all of them for IE) to get my site to display properly on IE and Firefox. After my last redesign where I aimed for <acronym title="eXtensible HyperText Markup Language">XHTML</acronym> 1.0 strict and everything I only needed one. PS. I found using borders on most divs help a lot.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: septor</title>
		<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1458</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:01:40 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1458</guid>
					<description>Compliance is for noobs. All my previous designs render the same in every browser I've tried, and none of them are valid. So suck on that w3c, and all of you compliance-nazis ;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Compliance is for noobs. All my previous designs render the same in every browser I&#8217;ve tried, and none of them are valid. So suck on that <acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym>, and all of you compliance-nazis ;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Remi</title>
		<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1459</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:44:29 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1459</guid>
					<description>Pat, if everyone's having their own standards, on what web browsers developpers will base their work on? The W3C is there to tell people and devs that this is THE standard for web pages, this is THE standard for styling, etc. But if you don't want your site to be compliant, that's your choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Pat, if everyone&#8217;s having their own standards, on what web browsers developpers will base their work on? The <acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym> is there to tell people and devs that this is THE standard for web pages, this is THE standard for styling, etc. But if you don&#8217;t want your site to be compliant, that&#8217;s your choice.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Phillip</title>
		<link>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1461</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 03:09:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/04/07/css-newbie#comment-1461</guid>
					<description>I hope you relise your site doesn't work in opera. Kinda sad really. And your comment, &quot;He just realized that most of the time, if something works in Firefox (or any Gecko-based browser) it doesn’t in IE, and vice-versa.&quot; which is wrong. And for those who said there are css hacks. You shouldn't really use css hacks. Majority of the sites out there which use css hacks, could achieve the same design without hacks. They should be only used as a last resort. Its sad really the amount of newbie web designers out there who use css hacks when they didnt need to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I hope you relise your site doesn&#8217;t work in opera. Kinda sad really. And your comment, &#8220;He just realized that most of the time, if something works in Firefox (or any Gecko-based browser) it doesn’t in IE, and vice-versa.&#8221; which is wrong. And for those who said there are <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> hacks. You shouldn&#8217;t really use <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> hacks. Majority of the sites out there which use <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> hacks, could achieve the same design without hacks. They should be only used as a last resort. Its sad really the amount of newbie web designers out there who use <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> hacks when they didnt need to.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
