Comments on: Image resizing http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing The hypermedia home of web design and multimedia student, Remi Prevost. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:01:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5 by: Joe http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1633 Wed, 06 Jul 2005 17:00:57 -0700 http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1633 <strong>Presentation.</strong> It's still the same image. Presentation. It’s still the same image.

]]> by: Remi http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1634 Wed, 06 Jul 2005 18:45:20 -0700 http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1634 I'd rather say it depends on the document as well. I was not asking you which of "content" or "presentation" was the right one ;) I’d rather say it depends on the document as well. I was not asking you which of “content” or “presentation” was the right one ;)

]]> by: septor http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1636 Wed, 06 Jul 2005 20:09:47 -0700 http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1636 You could save all this bull and just make the image the size you intend to use... You could save all this bull and just make the image the size you intend to use…

]]> by: Remi http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1637 Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:57:55 -0700 http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1637 Patrick, I mean, to <em>dynamically</em> resize it. Patrick, I mean, to dynamically resize it.

]]> by: septor http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1638 Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:53:54 -0700 http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1638 Why would you want to? Unless you're ripping images, which is wrong =D I guess if I were to ever become "lame" I would probably use the first method, as it uses the least amount of effort. The second way would work dandy, except it's more or less the same way as the first, so wtf? The third is stupid, unless you plan on resizing more than one image, no sense in making a class for one image ;] Why would you want to? Unless you’re ripping images, which is wrong =D

I guess if I were to ever become “lame” I would probably use the first method, as it uses the least amount of effort. The second way would work dandy, except it’s more or less the same way as the first, so wtf? The third is stupid, unless you plan on resizing more than one image, no sense in making a class for one image ;]

]]> by: Remi http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1639 Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:09:09 -0700 http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1639 If you make a photo gallery with only thumbnails, which can be clicked to be displayed in full size, in a popup window. You use the same image for the thumbnail <strong>and</strong> the fullsize image. Then, you'll need something to resize the fullsize image to make a thumbnail, won't you? If you make a photo gallery with only thumbnails, which can be clicked to be displayed in full size, in a popup window. You use the same image for the thumbnail and the fullsize image.

Then, you’ll need something to resize the fullsize image to make a thumbnail, won’t you?

]]> by: Joël http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1640 Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:17:39 -0700 http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1640 The best imho is a combination of 2 and 3. First you heck the actual size of the image to determine if it needs to be resized. Then, if needed, you assign a class to resize it. It's just about presentation, not content - unless you consider the fact of using one image instead of two is "content"... Oh, and what about client-side, dynamic resizing through javascript, too? (for example, if the screen is larger than 1024, don't resize, and so on...) The best imho is a combination of 2 and 3. First you heck the actual size of the image to determine if it needs to be resized. Then, if needed, you assign a class to resize it.

It’s just about presentation, not content - unless you consider the fact of using one image instead of two is “content”…

Oh, and what about client-side, dynamic resizing through javascript, too? (for example, if the screen is larger than 1024, don’t resize, and so on…)

]]> by: septor http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1641 Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:50:54 -0700 http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1641 ImageMagick. ImageMagick.

]]> by: Remi http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1642 Thu, 07 Jul 2005 19:48:11 -0700 http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1642 Image--What? Image–What?

]]> by: septor http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1643 Fri, 08 Jul 2005 08:33:20 -0700 http://old.exomel.com/weblog/2005/07/05/image-resizing#comment-1643 <a href='http://google.com/' rel="nofollow">Google</a> =D Google =D

]]>